Manchester City and the Premier League have officially settled their long-running dispute over the league’s Associated Party Transaction (APT) rules, putting an end to months of legal tension. This article explains the background, the main issues, settlement details, and broader impacts, supported by infographics for clarity.
Background of the Dispute
The Premier League introduced the APT rules in 2021, following the Saudi-backed takeover of Newcastle United, aimed at ensuring fair competition. The rules require that commercial deals involving clubs and entities linked to owners reflect fair market value to prevent clubs from inflating revenues artificially and distorting financial fair play.
Manchester City challenged these rules legally, claiming they were discriminatory and represented “a tyranny of the majority,” particularly criticizing that shareholder loans should also be scrutinized like sponsorship deals. The dispute escalated after the Premier League blocked two of City’s sponsorship deals, including a lucrative Etihad Airways deal, citing unfair market value.
Key Points of Dispute and Legal Rulings
| Issue | Manchester City Position | Premier League Position | Legal Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validity of APT Rules | Discriminatory, partial and “tyranny of the majority” | Rules necessary for integrity and fair competition | Independent panel ruled parts “void and unenforceable” |
| Sponsorship Deal Certifications | Unfairly blocked deals like Etihad Airways | Deals must reflect fair market value | City won 7 out of 10 key legal arguments |
| Shareholder Loans | Should be regulated like APTs | Loans are separate from sponsorship deals | Ongoing debate beyond current ruling |
Details of the Settlement
-
Manchester City accepted that the Premier League’s current APT rules are valid and binding.
-
Both parties agreed to terminate all ongoing arbitration and legal actions with no tribunal or further fees.
-
The previously blocked sponsorship deals, especially with Etihad Airways, can now proceed.
-
No party will make further comments about the dispute publicly.
This settlement does not affect the pending verdict on over 100 allegations of financial misconduct against Manchester City, which remain under independent commission review.
Impact and Significance
| Stakeholder | Impact |
|---|---|
| Manchester City | Gains clarity on sponsorship rules; can focus on future commercial deals and sporting performance without ongoing legal distractions |
| Premier League | Reinforces governance and financial fairness; demonstrates commitment to transparency |
| Other Clubs | Rules serve as a precedent and a safeguard to prevent financial distortions from related-party deals |
| Football Governance | Highlights tensions between commercial freedom and regulatory oversight in modern sports |
Timeline of Events
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2021 | Premier League introduces APT rules following Newcastle takeover |
| Early 2025 | Manchester City issues legal challenge against APT rules |
| Mid 2025 | Arbitration hearing; independent panel finds parts of rules unenforceable |
| September 7, 2025 | Manchester City and Premier League announce settlement and end dispute |
Conclusion
The settlement between Manchester City and the Premier League on the APT rules dispute closes a significant chapter in ensuring fair sponsorship and commercial dealings within English football’s top tier. While Manchester City successfully challenged aspects of the rules, its acceptance of the current regulations underscores the necessity of balancing club commercial ambitions with the league’s integrity and financial fairness frameworks. Both parties appear committed to cooperation and clarity moving forward, which bodes well for the stability of Premier League governance.
This case demonstrates the ongoing challenges elite clubs face balancing commercial interests with regulatory compliance and the broader implications for sports governance worldwide.