The Uganda Premier League (UPL) clubs are in a tense dispute with the Federation of Uganda Football Associations (FUFA) over proposed reforms aimed at reshaping the structure and operations of the league starting from the 2025-2026 season. This conflict has escalated, prompting the clubs to appeal for the intervention of the Minister of Sports to resolve the stalemate.
Background of the Dispute
FUFA proposed a new three-phase league format to modernize Ugandan football. The format involves an initial one-leg league round, followed by teams splitting into groups to compete in championship, ranking, and relegation rounds. Other reforms include changes in prize money distribution, new player contract rules demanding two-year agreements, and strict compliance measures such as biometric data tracking for all players.
FUFA claims these changes will enhance competitiveness, financial discipline, and transparency, helping to attract sponsorships and develop local football.
Clubs’ Opposition
Many UPL clubs, including giants like Vipers SC and SC Villa, strongly reject the new format and rules. Their main concerns include:
-
An unfair distribution model that penalizes clubs with larger fanbases by redistributing match-day revenues in ways that threaten their financial sustainability.
-
Increased operational costs due to new compliance requirements and extended contract obligations for players.
-
Lack of sufficient stakeholder consultation before pushing the reforms.
-
Fear that the changes could disrupt existing traditions and league integrity.
FUFA’s Response
In a counter-pressure move, FUFA warned that continued rejection of the reforms by clubs would result in the diversion of a funding package worth Shs3.4 billion — intended for player insurance, club support, and prize money — to support the FUFA Big League for at least the next three seasons.
Call for Ministerial Intervention
Due to the impasse, UPL clubs have appealed to the Minister of Sports for intervention. They advocate for a comprehensive stakeholder forum including clubs, sponsors, broadcasters, and football supporters to collaboratively review the proposed reforms. The clubs emphasize the need for investment in existing league infrastructure and governance rather than sudden format changes.
Current Status and Outlook
Negotiations remain stalled but ongoing. The Minister’s involvement is expected to bring renewed dialogue and hopefully a consensus that balances FUFA’s vision with the concerns of the clubs. The resolution of this dispute will be critical for the smooth running of the next season and for the future of Ugandan football development.
Summary Table of FUFA and UPL Clubs Dispute
| Key Aspects | Details |
|---|---|
| Parties Involved | FUFA vs Uganda Premier League Clubs |
| Proposed Reforms by FUFA | New three-phase league format, revised prize money distribution, player contract rules, biometric compliance |
| UPL Clubs’ Concerns | Unfair revenue sharing, threats to financial sustainability, increased costs, lack of consultation |
| FUFA’s Response | Threat to divert Shs3.4Bn funding to FUFA Big League, insistence on reforms |
| Current Status | Clubs seek Minister of Sports’ intervention, ongoing stalled negotiations |